National Preservation Glenn A. Walsh
Conference
2006,
Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230-1041 U.S.A.
Telephone: 412-561-7876
Carnegie Libraries: Electronic Mail: < gawalsh@andrewcarnegie.cc >
Challenges and Internet
Web Site: < http://www.andrewcarnegie.cc
>
Solutions 2006
November 3
Brief
Biography of Panelist: Glenn A. Walsh
A 1978 Journalism graduate from the
He served five years in the late 1990s as a Life Trustee for the
Andrew Carnegie Free Library and Music Hall in the
Mr.
Walsh will be speaking on politics and grass-roots preservation efforts.
Outline
of Presentation *** Photographs Prepared for Presentation
Primary Impediments
to Historic Preservation: EGO and MONEY !
I. Ego
A. Institution Administrators and/or Board
members
1. Looking to leave a legacy—change for
changes sake.
B. Politicians
1. Change—any change—to show constituents
they are “improving” community.
II. Money
A. Real Estate Developers/Speculators
1. Promote
new or renovated structure, which they think will increase community property
values, often with contributions to political campaigns.
B. Consultants, Architects, Contractors
1. Promote
building changes while seeking public contracts, often with contributions to
political campaigns.
C. Politicians & So-called “Economic
Development” (Subsidized Real Estate Speculation)
1. Politicians
risk public funds to try to buy additional real estate development; any
short-term gains come at a fairly high price, both monetarily and through loss
of history, and often do not translate into long-term gains.
a. Federal
“Urban Renewal” projects of the 1960s and 1970s [and later, UDAG (Urban
Development Action Grants)]– many now being undone.
` b. State
Redevelopment Assistance Capital Program Grants.
c. Local TIF
(Tax Increment Financing) packages, deferring municipal, county, and school
district property taxes to assist project construction.
2. So-called
“Economic Development” (Subsidized Real Estate Speculation) given high
priority, even if results in economic “musical chairs” and historic properties
are abandoned or demolished.
III. Case Studies: Original
Carnegie Libraries
A. Andrew Carnegie Free Library and Music
Hall, Carnegie PA *** Photographs
1. Origin & Endowment.
2. RAD Funding & Lawsuit Against Library
by Borough; Near Loss of RAD & State Funding.
3.
4. Already, some historic interior
“modernized” and fate of historic fixtures unknown.
5. ACLA & Discarding of Nearly Half of
Collection.
B. Original Neighborhood Branches:
Carnegie Library of
1. Hazelwood – Abandoned 2004. *** Photographs
2. Lawrenceville.
3.
4.
5.
First Public Library/Private University
Partnership through joint operating agreement (1997 – 2004).
6. New Library Leases with City & Hidden
Sales Option.
C Carnegie Free Library of Allegheny PA *** Photographs
1. Origin.
2. Urban Renewal in 1970s.
3. Lightning Strike and Abandonment: 2006.
D. Carnegie Free Libraries in Braddock *** Photographs,
1. Origins.
2. $1 Million Endowment for three libraries.
3. “Sell-off” of Braddock & Duquesne
Libraries – 1968.
4. Closure of USS Homestead Works &
Transfer of Endowment.
5. ACLA & Risk to Carnegie Free Library of
Braddock.
IV. Summation
and Solutions
A. Summation of Problem
1.
Ego and Money.
2.
a. Trying to
buy its way back to prosperity, yet population and resources are dwindling.
Trying to compete with newer cities in south and west on their terms—build all new and abandon the old. With newer cities
having increased population and resources, they will win this strategy.
b.
Pittsburgh and other older cities need to compete on their own terms—differentiation and maintaining existing
infrastructure to avoid high replacement costs, hence, having additional
resources for new or expanded infrastructure that the older cities do not
already have, or other needs.
B. Solutions
1. Educating the Public of Value of Historic
Preservation;
Preservation
= Conservation of Community Wealth, both monetarily and heritage.
2. Eternal Vigilance and Organizing Public
Involvement in Neighborhood Carnegie
Library;
Make
Politicians and Library Administrators Aware of True Neighborhood
Opposition
to Any Anti-Preservation Proposals.
3. “Modernization” Should Be Restricted to
Library Offerings and Programs
Which
Would Truly Benefit the Public --
NOT Brick-and-Mortar Projects in the
Guise of “Modernization,” Unless
It is a True Expansion Project with Minimal Effect on Historic Facilities.
gaw 2006-11-1